Random Ranting (147) · Gadgets & Tech (14) · Anime & Otaku (11) · Watches & Horology (42) · Movies & TV (6) · Photography (3)


Ads

Latest Posts Recent Comments Comrades


My blog is worth $4,516.32.
How much is your blog worth?


Calculating Torque

I just stumbled on a google mystery. I tried this conversion via the google calculator and got,

1 (oz / inch) = 0.0111612296 kg / cm

But this was quite wrong. How did I know this? I happened to be comparing a Hi-Tech servo that a friend is thinking of getting with one of the Airtronics servos I have.

That said the page lists his servo as,

Torque:
106.93 oz-in at 4.8V (7.7 kg-cm)
133.31 oz-in at 6.0V (9.6 kg-cm)

Something was quite off here, and the google calculator was giving me gibberish. So i worked it by hand,

1 inch = 2.54 centimeters
1 centimeter = 0.393700787 inch

1 kilogram = 35.2739619 ounces
1 ounce = 0.0283495231 kilograms

1 kg/cm = 35.2739619 oz * 0.393700787 = 13.8894 oz/inch
1 oz/inch = 0.0283495231 kg * 2.54 = 0.0720 kg/cm

133.31 * 0.0720 = 9.5994 kg/cm
200 * 0.0720 = 14.4016 kg/cm

Since I didn’t have a piece of paper at the time, a txt file had to suffice - problem sorted.

Related Posts & Articles

  • Google Calculator Error…
  • Even though I posted this a while back and even suggested Google correct this error, it is STILL showing the same mistake, ...and to make sure that it isn't I that is making an error, I found t...

3 Comments »

  1. bsodmike.com » Google Calculator Error… said,

    November 15, 2006 @ 3:30

    [...] Even though I posted this a while back and even suggested Google correct this error, it is STILL showing the same mistake, [...]

  2. Ian Patterson said,

    June 25, 2008 @ 16:11

    I believe that you are looking at this the wrong way.

    The google conversion is correct. Just maybe not what you were looking for. They are giving you a conversion for oz*in to kg*cm NOT oz/in and kg/cm. They are a ratio representing a maximum value since it would have more potential torque closer to the servo.

    Hope that helps.

  3. Ian Patterson said,

    June 25, 2008 @ 16:16

    My bad, they were wrong but the logic in my explanation is true since servos have less torque as you move further away from the servo. I notice that they have corrected the value to 0.0720… which is correct.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment


Google Search


RSS/Meta Articles