September 19, 2008 at 0:59
· Filed under Watches & Horology
Please note the ‘errata’ information posted on the YouTube page.
- Rolex UK Price Increase: 2nd October 2008
Who would have imagined this - especially with the last increase in March, another price increase in the UK. The US also got hit on the 1st of October, but that is understandable with their whole eco...
- Review: Omega Planet Ocean vs. Rolex Sea-Dweller
This comparative review has been authored by Shaun, and is being published here with his express permission. It pits the Omega Planet Ocean vs. the Rolex Sea-Dweller in this extremely factual and...
- The History of The Rolex President
Jake's Rolex Watch Blog is currently featuring a fantastic series covering the history of the Rolex President.
To quote Jake,
My first conscious experience with Rolex was when I was 14 years old, ...
- Rolex Ranting…
So much for staying silent; no more. The problem lies in the fact that many Rolex owners are used to the 'classic' bracelet found on a good portion of the Rolex range today.
The 'classic' brac...
- Video Review of the Rolex GMTIIC TT 116713LN
This is a video review of my TTIIC.
Hope you like it!...
Permalink
September 19, 2008 at 0:38
· Filed under Gastronomie & Fine Dining
Here’s a shot of us at Auberge de Savièse in Geneve - it’s a great little place serving all my favourites: cheese fondue with champagne, raclette, and escargot in herb butter sauce!! mmmmm!

Permalink
September 5, 2008 at 4:02
· Filed under Random Ranting

I ordered two Leatherman products from Heinnie Haynes a couple days ago. One was classed as a 2.8″ knife, the e306X, and the other was classed a ‘tool’ with a knife, the Skeletool CX. The latter of the two is located at the bottom of the photo below,

Although, I had the e306X about two days longer than the CX, I was pleased to find that I liked the CX far more than the e306X. The CX was also priced about £15 cheaper.
The similarities of both the tools are listed below:
- Both have a blade, of similar or identical length. They are both well under 3″ and are legal for everyday carry in the UK. The CX features a 154CM blade with a much sexier blade profile.
- The CX has a built-in carbiner clip/bottle opener. This is also available on the e306X but has to be first deployed.
- Even though the e306X has you deploying tools more (this becomes a real pain), they are both the same physical size with the e306X with all tools closed - the e306X is far longer with tools open when compared to the CX.
- The e306X has one extra ‘bit’. Not a deal breaker considering there is a 21-bit kit available from Leatherman. The CX carries two in total.
The similarities between the two products pretty much ends there. Take a look at the CX in the photo below, with its needle nose plier folded open,

The CX has a very nice heft to it - just right in my opinion. The added carbon fibre in the handle is a gimmick tbh, as it is still as heavy as the older non-CX Skeletool…what gives? The Tungsten DLC coating is guaranteed to wear off if you simply treat it for what it is - a great tool, so in comparison the all SS version would probably look better after a hard beating.
However, the non-CX does not have the combination serrated and non-serrated edged blade, which is fantastic on the CX. It has a nifty groove on the thumb so that one can open it single handedly.
So what’s the verdict? The e306X is going back to Heinnie tomorrow and I’m hanging on to the CX…I love it. Even if I end up only using it for the bottle opener and knife, it’s still a fabulous idea and I adore its ‘raw’ skeletal look. It has the allure akin to that of a Porsche or Aston Martin DB9 Vanquish - the Swiss Army Knife is simply your run of the mill ‘Ford’…
Now where did I put that bottle of Heineken at?
Permalink
September 3, 2008 at 2:38
· Filed under Random Ranting
The subject title says it all. There really isn’t much to report apart from the fact that all the hard work gone into MARV culminated into a meeting with my thesis supervisor and a simple demonstration of its operation.
However, due to the lack of PI/PID control implemented I may have to continue developing it further to obtain data from the robot to compare with ‘instructed commands’ and what it actually does for including in a paper that I will have to author after I submit my bound thesis.
Back to returning to my ‘infinite while loop’ of a life
Permalink